User Tools

Site Tools


provenance:security:authentication

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
provenance:security:authentication [2026/09/11 07:14] – New page: working log for Security:Authentication — the inclusion rule, the 184-candidate hand audit, five probes plus a full-text recall pass, folds and residue, 95 quote checks, external sources and rejections, four review passes, and the scripts with t karel.kubicek.claudeprovenance:security:authentication [2026/09/11 07:18] (current) – Count this section's own table in the render check. Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude
Line 225: Line 225:
 | **The ''poster'' paper {[tchokodeu2024_poster]}** | IN, flagged in its verdict reason as a poster whose figures are preliminary | OUT for being two pages. It is the only paper here whose frame is organisations rather than a ranking list, which is worth showing | | **The ''poster'' paper {[tchokodeu2024_poster]}** | IN, flagged in its verdict reason as a poster whose figures are preliminary | OUT for being two pages. It is the only paper here whose frame is organisations rather than a ranking list, which is worth showing |
 | **Publishing "nobody uses an LLM"** | Published, with the year-by-year corpus counts and the thin-slice caveat in the same paragraph | Withhold it. The claim rests on an enum over a provisional slice, and "nobody" is the kind of word a probe should not be allowed to produce — which is why it is stated as an enum count over the population, not as a probe result | | **Publishing "nobody uses an LLM"** | Published, with the year-by-year corpus counts and the thin-slice caveat in the same paragraph | Withhold it. The claim rests on an enum over a provisional slice, and "nobody" is the kind of word a probe should not be allowed to produce — which is why it is stated as an enum count over the population, not as a probe result |
 +
 +===== After Publishing: What the Rendered Page Showed =====
 +
 +Source-level checks pass on a page that renders wrong, so both pages were verified against the rendered DOM after saving, not against their wikitext.
 +
 +^ Check ^ Result ^
 +| **The bibliography was stale, silently.** The content page first rendered **24 reference entries for 51 distinct citekeys**, numbered up to [51] with gaps — every inline marker resolved, so nothing looked broken. bibtex4dw had served a cached parse of ''literature:bibliography'' that predated the 27 new entries | Fixed by requesting ''?purge=true'' on the bibliography and then on each citing page. The content page now renders **51 of 51** with no gaps, and ''security'' renders its four new keys |
 +| Content page structure | 11 h2, 21 h3, 12 tables, 131 table rows, both boxes as ''div''s, **0 red links**, no leftover literal markup |
 +| Provenance page structure | 16 h2, 22 h3, 15 tables (this one included), 13 ''pre'' blocks — 12 file blocks and one code block — 23 reference entries, **0 red links** after fixing one namespace-relative ''%%[[artifacts]]%%'' |
 +| The escaped citekey | ''%%{[key]}%%'' renders as literal text rather than resolving, which is the point of the escape |
 +| Site-wide red-link gate | ''node scripts/sitemap.mjs'' — 174 pages, 4 promised-but-missing, all 4 declared on [[:roadmap]], **0 undeclared**, exit 0 |
  
 ===== Review Passes ===== ===== Review Passes =====
Line 262: Line 273:
 | 2 | The CTAP row named 2.3 (Proposed Standard, 2026-02-26) and missed that **CTAP 2.3.1 has been in Working Draft since 2026-05-29**, published to the specs directory in August | **Accepted and fixed.** The row now carries both | | 2 | The CTAP row named 2.3 (Proposed Standard, 2026-02-26) and missed that **CTAP 2.3.1 has been in Working Draft since 2026-05-29**, published to the specs directory in August | **Accepted and fixed.** The row now carries both |
 | 3 | The Microsoft Entra citation was dated 2026-08-26, which is an ''updated_at'' metadata value whose matching commit edits a shared include; the page itself displays "Last updated on 2026-06-23" | **Accepted and fixed.** The footnote now gives the displayed date and explains the discrepancy — which Pass 2 read the other way round, so the footnote records both readings | | 3 | The Microsoft Entra citation was dated 2026-08-26, which is an ''updated_at'' metadata value whose matching commit edits a shared include; the page itself displays "Last updated on 2026-06-23" | **Accepted and fixed.** The footnote now gives the displayed date and explains the discrepancy — which Pass 2 read the other way round, so the footnote records both readings |
-| 4 | Six URLs inside the //reproduced script output// are dead (a 401 anonymous-review link, three 404s, a 502, a 403) | **Accepted as informational, not fixed.** They are artifact links the **papers themselves** declared, reproduced verbatim inside a ''%%<file>%%'' block. Rewriting them would falsify the audit trail; the rot is the finding, and [[artifacts]] is the page about it |+| 4 | Six URLs inside the //reproduced script output// are dead (a 401 anonymous-review link, three 404s, a 502, a 403) | **Accepted as informational, not fixed.** They are artifact links the **papers themselves** declared, reproduced verbatim inside a ''%%<file>%%'' block. Rewriting them would falsify the audit trail; the rot is the finding, and [[:artifacts]] is the page about it |
 | — | Tally | 31 of 34 external claims verified correct, including every GitHub date via the commits API rather than ''pushed_at'', the FIDO MDS 429 reproduced on three retries, and the Web Almanac's zero WebAuthn mentions | | — | Tally | 31 of 34 external claims verified correct, including every GitHub date via the commits API rather than ''pushed_at'', the FIDO MDS 429 reproduced on three retries, and the Web Almanac's zero WebAuthn mentions |
  
Line 4021: Line 4032:
   * The roadmap row this page closed: [[:roadmap]], with its own log at [[provenance:roadmap]]   * The roadmap row this page closed: [[:roadmap]], with its own log at [[provenance:roadmap]]
   * The neighbour that owns login-as-an-instrument: [[Programming:Registration]] and [[provenance:programming:registration]]   * The neighbour that owns login-as-an-instrument: [[Programming:Registration]] and [[provenance:programming:registration]]
 +
 +====== References ======
 +
 +The same shared bibliography as the content page; this log adds no entries of its own.
 +
 +<bibtex bibliography></bibtex>
  
provenance/security/authentication.1789110848.txt.gz · Last modified: by karel.kubicek.claude