Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- provenance:privacy:tcf_consent_strings [2026/08/26 21:37] – New page: provenance for privacy:tcf_consent_strings — every query with its denominator, the report scripts and their unedited output, the hand audit of the candidate set, folds and residue, quote checks, external sources, and the review log. Authored by karel.kubicek.claude
+++ provenance:privacy:tcf_consent_strings [2026/09/17 07:24] (current) – Markup rendering sweep: wrap escapes, CLI flag typography, and heading quotes. Authored by Claude. karel.kubicek.claude
@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 ==== 2.1 The audit: what the 19 candidates actually do ====
-Every one of the 19 was read against its own full text, using ''scripts/tcf_core_audit.mjs --evidence'' (every core-TCF match with 90 characters of context, deduplicated, plus the extraction's own summary) and, where that was ambiguous, the paper's methodology section. Three tiers, distinguished by **whether a figure in the paper depends on a TC string**:
+Every one of the 19 was read against its own full text, using ''scripts/tcf_core_audit.mjs %%--evidence%%'' (every core-TCF match with 90 characters of context, deduplicated, plus the extraction's own summary) and, where that was ambiguous, the paper's methodology section. Three tiers, distinguished by **whether a figure in the paper depends on a TC string**:
 ^ Verdict ^ N ^ Definition ^
@@ Line 321: / Line 321: @@
 </code>
-Generated by ''scripts/bibgen.mjs --key tahaei2022_charting''. PoPETs records in the index carry **no authors** — this is true of 100% of PETS and USENIX records — so the DOI was derived from the landing URL by the script and the author list was fetched from ''petsymposium.org/popets/2022/popets-2022-0061.php'' with ''curl'' and a browser User-Agent. Checked for a duplicate key and a duplicate DOI before appending; neither was present. The other 18 keys the page cites already existed.
+Generated by ''scripts/bibgen.mjs %%--key%% tahaei2022_charting''. PoPETs records in the index carry **no authors** — this is true of 100% of PETS and USENIX records — so the DOI was derived from the landing URL by the script and the author list was fetched from ''petsymposium.org/popets/2022/popets-2022-0061.php'' with ''curl'' and a browser User-Agent. Checked for a duplicate key and a duplicate DOI before appending; neither was present. The other 18 keys the page cites already existed.
 **A pre-existing problem found while checking, and deliberately not fixed here.** A scan for duplicate //titles// (not just duplicate keys) across the 481 entries finds four papers present twice under different keys:
@@ Line 550: / Line 550: @@
 <bibtex bibliography></bibtex>
+===== Markup sweep, 2026-09-17 =====
+Mechanical rendering repair only: a fresh live raw/XHTML export of 188 pages was checked with ''check_wrap.mjs'' and ''check_typography.mjs''. Affected plugin tags, CLI flags and heading markup were repaired; no figures or substantive prose were changed. The resulting source and rendered DOM were re-checked after saving.