Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- provenance:privacy:requests [2026/09/04 17:30] – Citekey consolidation 2026-09-04: repoint duplicate bibliography keys to the kept key and add a dated amendment; no prose or figure changed. Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude
+++ provenance:privacy:requests [2026/09/21 14:57] (current) – Amendment 2026-09-21: record the removal of the duplicate which-lists table, the stale 198 pointer (filter_lists prints 194), the script output behind every figure kept, and the rendered-DOM structural check. Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude
@@ Line 920: / Line 920: @@
 ===== 10. Guard runs, and what each iteration caught =====
-''check_page_numbers.mjs'' was run whole-page, windowed on the corpus section, and with ''--code''. It took three iterations:
+''check_page_numbers.mjs'' was run whole-page, windowed on the corpus section, and with ''%%--code%%''. It took three iterations:
 ^ Run ^ Unaccounted ^ What it found ^
 | 1 | 45 | The per-paper figures were verified but **not printed** by ''verify_requests_figures.mjs'', so the guard could not see them. Fixed by printing every ''FOUND'' line. Also exposed that the verify script only covered 63 of the page's figures; extended to 143 |
 | 2 | 10 | Version-string and licence fragments (''0.13'' from ''0.13.2'', ''3.0'' from GPL-3.0), now in a ''NOT_FIGURES'' block with reasons. And two **real errors**: the page still said the verification had covered "63 of 63 figures" after the verifier had been extended well past that, and it described 410.5 days as a **median** when the paper reports it as the **mean** (median 195.5) |
-| 3 | 0 (''--code'': 3) | Inside the embedded ''%%<file>%%'' block: the script's docstring quoted EasyList's **total** rule count (77,736) where the page quotes its **network** rule count. Aligned both to 52,556 |
+| 3 | 0 (''%%--code%%'': 3) | Inside the embedded ''%%<file>%%'' block: the script's docstring quoted EasyList's **total** rule count (77,736) where the page quotes its **network** rule count. Aligned both to 52,556 |
 ''check_page_numbers.mjs'' is **not** run against this provenance page: its numbers are meta (section numbers, DOIs, the size of the old page, figures quoted precisely because they were rejected), so the guard's whole premise does not apply. Running it anyway reports 13 unaccounted values, all of that kind.
@@ Line 1016: / Line 1016: @@
 <bibtex bibliography></bibtex>
+===== Markup sweep, 2026-09-17 =====
+Mechanical rendering repair only: a fresh live raw/XHTML export of 188 pages was checked with ''check_wrap.mjs'' and ''check_typography.mjs''. Affected plugin tags, CLI flags and heading markup were repaired; no figures or substantive prose were changed. The resulting source and rendered DOM were re-checked after saving.
+===== Amendment, 2026-09-21: the duplicate "which lists" table was removed =====
+**What was wrong.** This page's //Use in Publications// carried a full per-list adoption table over its S1 population (197 papers), and [[programming:filter_lists]] carried the same table, computed by the same fold, over a 194-paper population. Two copies of one table, maintained separately, drift; [[provenance:programming:filter_lists]] recorded the duplication as a **live inconsistency left for a later run to finish**, and this is that run. A second, smaller defect came with it: the sentence introducing the table described the filter-lists population as **198 papers**, which was that page's figure before its tuple-context exclusion. That page has printed **194** since, so the pointer was quoting a number the target page no longer published.
+**The commands and their real output.**
+<code>
+$ node scripts/report_requests.mjs
+S1 — used or produced an ad-or-tracker filter list                197
+S2 — classified web requests for an advertising/tracking purpose  164
+**page population = S1 ∪ S2**                                     254
+Denominator: 197 papers that used or produced an ad-or-tracker filter list.
+EasyList                                                        110     55.8%         32
+EasyPrivacy                                                     71      36.0%         26
+Disconnect                                                      48      24.4%         28
+Ghostery / WhoTracks.me                                         34      17.3%         12
+── Exact-string vs folded, for the four lists the page names ──
+  EasyList                 exact-string  90  folded 110  undercount 18.2%
+  Disconnect               exact-string  26  folded  48  undercount 45.8%
+$ node scripts/report_filter_lists.mjs
+   USED or PRODUCED a filter list  == POPULATION               194 3.3% of corpus
+</code>
+**What changed.** The fifteen-row table and the //Folding is not cosmetic here// paragraph were replaced by two paragraphs. The first keeps the four figures a reader of //this// page needs — 197, and EasyList 110 (55.8%), EasyPrivacy 71 (36.0%), Disconnect 48 (24.4%), Ghostery / WhoTracks.me 34 (17.3%) — together with the folding lesson stated at its strongest (90 against 110, and 26 against 48), and points at [[programming:filter_lists#Which lists|the canonical table]]. The second explains the 197-against-194 gap as a property of two membership rules rather than a disagreement. **Neither count was changed and neither was reconciled**, which is the standing instruction for this pair: both scripts import ''req_fold.mjs'', so the fold is identical and only the membership rule differs. The engines-and-parsers sentence was kept — it is not duplicated on the filter-lists page — and the S1/S2 narrative above it is untouched.
+**Rendered-DOM check.** Tables on the page went **14 → 13** and rows **114 → 98** (one header plus fifteen list rows). Headings (28), list items (60) and ''<pre>'' blocks (0) are unchanged, and the page carries **0** ''wikilink2'' red links. The ''%%[[programming:filter_lists#Which lists]]%%'' pointer resolves against the real heading id ''which_lists'' on the target page.
+**Reviewers.** One ''sonnet'' figures-against-script pass, covering the edited passage and the sections either side of it. No citations pass: no ''{[citekey]}'' and no quoted claim was touched.