User Tools

Site Tools


provenance:design:sampling

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
provenance:design:sampling [2026/09/17 07:23] – Markup rendering sweep: wrap escapes, CLI flag typography, and heading quotes. Authored by Claude. karel.kubicek.claudeprovenance:design:sampling [2026/09/21 14:58] (current) – Amendment 2026-09-21: record the crawl-depth scope note against programming:interaction (same 155 numerator, 680 vs 417 denominators), the roster comparison showing the 155 sets are NOT identical (149 overlap, unpublished), the refreshed Hispar/HTTP Archi karel.kubicek.claude
Line 300: Line 300:
  
 Mechanical rendering repair only: a fresh live raw/XHTML export of 188 pages was checked with ''check_wrap.mjs'' and ''check_typography.mjs''. Affected plugin tags, CLI flags and heading markup were repaired; no figures or substantive prose were changed. The resulting source and rendered DOM were re-checked after saving. Mechanical rendering repair only: a fresh live raw/XHTML export of 188 pages was checked with ''check_wrap.mjs'' and ''check_typography.mjs''. Affected plugin tags, CLI flags and heading markup were repaired; no figures or substantive prose were changed. The resulting source and rendered DOM were re-checked after saving.
 +
 +===== Amendment, 2026-09-21: crawl-depth figures scoped against programming:interaction, and the Hispar box refreshed =====
 +
 +**What was wrong.** Nothing on this page was a wrong number. Two things were wrong for a reader who reads two pages.
 +
 +  * **The depth figures had no scope note.** This page publishes **22.8% of 680** landing-page-only and **15.0%** stating a subpage count; [[programming:interaction]] publishes **37.2% of 417** on the site-depth axis and **12.1% of 857** giving a subpage number. Four figures, two pages, no sentence anywhere telling a reader why they differ.
 +  * **The Hispar box was stale.** Checked 2026-08-12, it said "no maintained equivalent list was found", and the //Open Questions// bullet said the 2020 landing-page result "stands unaddressed, with no tooling to address it". Both had been overtaken by [[programming:interaction]], which documents HTTP Archive's one-secondary-page-per-site crawl (April 2022 onwards, ''is_root_page'' / ''root_page'' columns, ''MAX_DEPTH = 1'' / ''MAX_BREADTH = 1'', the first same-origin link) and measures what that rule misses.
 +
 +**The commands and their real output.**
 +
 +<code>
 +$ node scripts/report_sampling.mjs
 +page population that also crawled: 680
 +Interaction depth      Papers  Share of 680
 +single-target-page     222     32.6%
 +landing-page-only      155     22.8%
 +landing-plus-subpages  128     18.8%
 +deep-crawl             92      13.5%
 +not-stated             69      10.1%
 +no crawlConfig record  14      2.1%
 +states how many subpages per site: 102  15.0%
 +  median 10, max 2000
 +goes past the landing page: 220  32.4%
 +papers with unit `websites` that crawled: 492
 +  landing page only:                      122  24.8%
 +
 +$ node scripts/report_interaction.mjs
 +webCrawled  (crawled AND platforms includes 'web')         857   <- this page's denominator
 +  denominator: 417 papers (NOT 857; single-target-page and not-stated are excluded)
 +landing-page-only      155     37.2%
 +  denominator: 857 web crawls; 104 (12.1%) give a number.
 +  of the 417 on the site-depth axis, 102 (24.5%) give a number.
 +</code>
 +
 +**The reconciliation, and why it is a scope note and not a merge.** The two pages report the **same raw count of landing-page-only papers, 155**, and divide it by different denominators: 680 here (every paper with a web-unit population that also crawled, keeping ''single-target-page'', ''not-stated'' and the no-record papers in the denominator) against 417 there (only the web crawls that put a value on the site-depth axis). That is the whole of the 22.8%-against-37.2% gap, and it is now stated on this page in those terms.
 +
 +**The matching 155 is a coincidence of count, not a shared set, and the page says so.** Before writing the sentence, the two rosters were compared directly, because "the same 155 papers" would have been the natural and wrong thing to write:
 +
 +<code>
 +interaction landing-only: 155     sampling landing-only: 155
 +intersection: 149
 +in interaction not sampling: 6    in sampling not interaction: 6
 +</code>
 +
 +The six each way are the two population definitions, not an error: this page needs a ''population[].unit'' in {websites, domains, web-pages}, that page needs ''platforms'' to include ''web''. Traffic-analysis and censorship papers sit in one and not the other. **No overlap figure was published** — it is not produced by either page's report script, and publishing it would put a number on a page that no script regenerates. It is recorded here instead, which is what this page is for, so that a later run does not "reconcile" two counts that only look identical.
 +
 +**What changed on the page.**
 +
 +  - The //One page per site is the norm// summary gained a paragraph stating the 680-against-417 scope difference explicitly, naming the 222 + 69 + 14 rows that this page keeps and that page excludes, and warning that the 155-paper sets are not identical.
 +  - The **15.0%** sentence gained its numerator (102 of 680) and a pointer to the 12.1% (104 of 857) with its own denominator named.
 +  - The Hispar ''%%<WRAP todo>%%'' box was rewritten: Hispar is still gone (NXDOMAIN, 2026-08-12, unchanged), but the box now records HTTP Archive as the one maintained source of internal pages, states the selection rule that makes it a by-product rather than a sample, and points at the measured demonstration on [[programming:interaction]]. The claim's footnotes and their check dates live on that page and were **not** copied here — one number, one page.
 +  - The //Open Questions// bullet was rewritten the same way: the gap is now "no maintained internal-page //list//", not "no tooling".
 +
 +**Rendered-DOM check.** Page body after the table of contents: list items 40, headings 33, tables 13, ''%%<pre>%%'' blocks 2 — **all four identical before and after**, so nothing was swallowed by the rewritten ''%%<WRAP>%%'' box or by the wrapped //Open Questions// bullet. **0** ''wikilink2'' red links. All three cross-page anchors resolve against real heading ids on ''programming:interaction'': ''depth_has_more_than_three_positions'', ''how_deep_the_field_actually_goes'', ''the_one_page_list_that_included_internal_pages_is_gone''.
 +
 +**Finding rejected.** The first draft of the scope note compared this page's **24.8% of 492** against the 37.2%, because that is the pairing the task named. It was dropped: 24.8% is the ''unit == websites'' cut (122 of 492) and shares neither numerator nor denominator with anything on the other page, so pairing them would have invented a comparison. The comparable pair is 22.8% of 680 against 37.2% of 417, which share the numerator 155. The 24.8% sentence is left exactly as it was.
 +
 +**Reviewers.** One ''sonnet'' figures-against-script pass over both edits and the sections either side of them. No citations pass: no ''{[citekey]}'' and no quoted claim was touched — ''{[aqeel2020_landing]}'' and the Aqeel quote in the same subsection are unchanged.
  
provenance/design/sampling.txt · Last modified: by karel.kubicek.claude