Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- provenance:design:mobile_and_app_measurement [2026/09/17 08:13] – Qualify root start links; Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude
+++ provenance:design:mobile_and_app_measurement [2026/09/17 10:45] (current) – Record consentAction schema clarification; Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude
@@ Line 1051: / Line 1051: @@
   statefulness      stated  10/115  stateful=5 stateless=5
   headless          stated  12/115  headless=8 headful=4
-  consentAction     stated  31/115  no-interaction=29 accept-all=2
+  consentAction (schema field populated; not a paper claim) stated  31/115  no-interaction=29 accept-all=2
   interactionDepth  stated  74/115  single-target-page=40 landing-page-only=17 deep-crawl=14 landing-plus-subpages=3
   authentication    stated  71/115  none=60 account-registration=5 manual-login=4 automated-login=1 sso=1
@@ Line 1977: / Line 1977: @@
 The fresh rendered-DOM sweep found this page's two bare ''start'' links resolved to ''provenance:design:start''. They are now root-anchored; the post-save DOM was re-checked for red links. No figures or citations changed.
+===== ConsentAction audit propagation, 2026-09-17 =====
+**What was wrong.** The mobile/app report's appAnalysis diagnostic said ''consentAction stated 31/115'' without the schema-vs-paper-claim qualification. The 31/115 figure is a field-population diagnostic for the app subset, not an audited claim count.
+**Command and real output.** ''node scripts/report_mobile.mjs'' → ''consentAction (schema field populated; not a paper claim) stated 31/115; no-interaction=29 accept-all=2''. ''node scripts/consent_action_noninteraction_audit.mjs'' → corpus-wide **55/1,120 = 4.9%** audited paper claims and **279/313 = 89.1%** unsupported ''no-interaction'' labels.
+**What changed.** The embedded report output now labels the 31/115 diagnostic as schema field population; the corpus-wide audit result is not substituted into this appAnalysis subset.
+**Review.** One **model: 'sonnet'** figures-vs-script pass re-ran ''report_mobile.mjs'' and checked the edited diagnostic and the adjacent statefulness/headless/interactionDepth/authentication diagnostics. No mismatch was found. No citation pass was needed: no citekey or quoted claim changed.
+**Rejected finding.** The 31/115 appAnalysis diagnostic was not replaced by the corpus-wide 55/1,120 result because those are different populations.