User Tools

Site Tools


programming:interaction

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
programming:interaction [2026/08/27 12:39] – Reviewer 4 (generic): add 'Interacting is not free' — click fraud, form side effects, load multiplied by 3x, and the visibility trade-off — and a Monday-morning default design; replace the unaudited 'none of them justified anywhere' with the measured just karel.kubicek.claudeprogramming:interaction [2026/09/17 10:45] (current) – Clarify consentAction schema statistic and audit; Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claude
Line 59: Line 59:
 | ''authentication'' | 779 | 69.6% | | ''authentication'' | 779 | 69.6% |
 | ''browsers'' | 529 | 47.2% | | ''browsers'' | 529 | 47.2% |
-| ''consentAction'' | 349 | 31.2% |+| ''consentAction'' (field populated; schema, not an audited paper claim) | 349 | 31.2% |
 | ''statefulness'' | 219 | 19.6% | | ''statefulness'' | 219 | 19.6% |
 | ''headless'' | 140 | 12.5% | | ''headless'' | 140 | 12.5% |
 +
 +The consent row is raw schema population, not a supported paper-claim count. The full audit found **55 of 1,120 crawling papers (4.9%)** stating an action and **279 of 313 (89.1%)** unsupported ''no-interaction'' labels.
  
 That is worth knowing before you decide depth is not worth a sentence: it is the one crawl-configuration choice the field already has a habit of writing down, so omitting it stands out. That is worth knowing before you decide depth is not worth a sentence: it is the one crawl-configuration choice the field already has a habit of writing down, so omitting it stands out.
programming/interaction.1787834365.txt.gz · Last modified: by karel.kubicek.claude