User Tools

Site Tools


privacy:server_side_tracking

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
privacy:server_side_tracking [2026/08/21 06:56] – Sync the cited EasyPrivacy version and commit to the provenance page's committed script output, and note that it moved three times in half an hour. Authored by Claude karel.kubicek.claudeprivacy:server_side_tracking [2026/08/21 08:28] (current) – [Open Questions] karelkubicek
Line 161: Line 161:
 ===== Open Questions ===== ===== Open Questions =====
  
-<wrap todo>+<WRAP todo>
   * **Nobody has isolated the effect of interaction depth on measured SST prevalence.** It is the largest apparent driver of the 0.38%–38% spread and it is a clean, cheap experiment: one population, one vantage, four interaction depths. This page would most like this done.   * **Nobody has isolated the effect of interaction depth on measured SST prevalence.** It is the largest apparent driver of the 0.38%–38% spread and it is a clean, cheap experiment: one population, one vantage, four interaction depths. This page would most like this done.
   * **No SST detector published at a main security or measurement venue can be run today.** The one that was — Fouad et al. at PETS 2024 — needs a 2020 baseline crawl. Of the three runnable methods, one //is// peer-reviewed but at a workshop outside these seven venues {[moti2025_bitterpill]}, one is a preprint {[jazlan2026_sstguard]}, and one is accepted at CCS 2026 {[mertens2026_gtm]} but not yet presented. **That last one closes this gap when CCS 2026 is held** — check before repeating this sentence. An earlier draft of it read "no peer-reviewed SST detector exists that can be run", which was simply wrong about Moti et al.   * **No SST detector published at a main security or measurement venue can be run today.** The one that was — Fouad et al. at PETS 2024 — needs a 2020 baseline crawl. Of the three runnable methods, one //is// peer-reviewed but at a workshop outside these seven venues {[moti2025_bitterpill]}, one is a preprint {[jazlan2026_sstguard]}, and one is accepted at CCS 2026 {[mertens2026_gtm]} but not yet presented. **That last one closes this gap when CCS 2026 is held** — check before repeating this sentence. An earlier draft of it read "no peer-reviewed SST detector exists that can be run", which was simply wrong about Moti et al.
Line 171: Line 171:
   * **Longitudinal growth is unmeasured.** Fouad et al. named it as future work in 2024 and it has not been done. There is no published SST time series, so "SST is growing" is currently an assertion.   * **Longitudinal growth is unmeasured.** Fouad et al. named it as future work in 2024 and it has not been done. There is no published SST time series, so "SST is growing" is currently an assertion.
   * **Venue coverage is itself a limitation here.** A reading list built from this corpus alone would contain one paper: of the four studies in the main table, one is a preprint, one is a DPM workshop paper outside these venues, and one is accepted at CCS 2026 but not yet held. The state of a literature and the state of a corpus of it are not the same thing.   * **Venue coverage is itself a limitation here.** A reading list built from this corpus alone would contain one paper: of the four studies in the main table, one is a preprint, one is a DPM workshop paper outside these venues, and one is accepted at CCS 2026 but not yet held. The state of a literature and the state of a corpus of it are not the same thing.
-</wrap>+</WRAP>
  
 ===== Methodology and Limitations of These Figures ===== ===== Methodology and Limitations of These Figures =====
privacy/server_side_tracking.1787295381.txt.gz · Last modified: by karel.kubicek.claude

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki