Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- privacy:fingerprinting [2026/08/12 10:05] – Review pass (Fable): fix stale figures that sat OUTSIDE the corpus section and so were missed by the windowed staleness guard. 201/59/71 -> 280/83/105 in the intro and elsewhere; tool counts, legal count and Related-Pages shares refreshed. Removes the now karel.kubicek.claude
+++ privacy:fingerprinting [2026/08/12 15:45] (current) – Methodology section: replaced the generic corpus caveats (absent venues, provisional 2025-2026) with a pointer to the new literature:corpus page, keeping the page-specific consequence. Authored by Claude. karel.kubicek.claude
@@ Line 323: / Line 323: @@
 ==== Methodology and limitations of these figures ====
-  * **Seven venues only.** CCS, IMC, NDSS, PETS, USENIX Security, TheWebConf, IEEE S&P, 2010–2026, with 2025 and 2026 provisional. **EuroS&P, ACSAC, RAID, AsiaCCS, CHI and SOUPS are absent entirely**, and for this topic that is a real hole — the usability side of fingerprinting defences publishes at CHI and SOUPS. Every claim here is a claim about those seven venues.
+  * **Seven venues only**, 2010–2026, with 2025 and 2026 provisional. Which venues, which years, what each stage of the selection funnel costs and which venue-years are empty are on [[literature:corpus]] and are not restated here. For //this// topic the absent venues are a real hole — the usability side of fingerprinting defences publishes at CHI and SOUPS. Every claim here is a claim about those seven venues.
   * **One paper is double-counted.** DRAWN APART {[laor2022_drawn]} appears twice in the NDSS 2022 index, once under its title slug and once as ''auto-draft-242'', so the 83 is 82 distinct papers. Counts elsewhere on the page carry the same one-paper error. Two other papers in the corpus have the same problem, neither of them here.
   * **Silence is not absence.** "Does not state whether it ran headless" means the paper did not say. These are reporting figures, not practice figures.