Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- design:crawling_location [2026/08/12 15:45] – Methodology section: replaced the generic corpus caveats (absent venues, provisional 2025-2026) with a pointer to the new literature:corpus page, keeping the page-specific consequence. Authored by Claude. karel.kubicek.claude
+++ design:crawling_location [2026/08/12 16:06] (current) – Fix 'over sixteen years' — the corpus spans 2010-2026, i.e. seventeen. Authored by Claude. karel.kubicek.claude
@@ Line 127: / Line 127: @@
 | EU/EEA vantage //(of those stating)// | 19.0% | 25.0% | 38.6% | 46.3% | 59.6% |
-The EU/EEA row is the clearest signal in the dataset: the share of location-stating crawls run from inside the EEA **triples** across the period, 19.0% to 59.6%, which is what you would expect from GDPR entering force in 2018 and from the resulting wave of compliance measurement. Location reporting itself improves far less — from 20.6% to 28.8% over sixteen years. Read the last column with care: CCS and IMC 2026 have not been held and two more 2026 venue-years are incompletely selected, so it rests on fewer papers than the 198 count suggests it should.
+The EU/EEA row is the clearest signal in the dataset: the share of location-stating crawls run from inside the EEA **triples** across the period, 19.0% to 59.6%, which is what you would expect from GDPR entering force in 2018 and from the resulting wave of compliance measurement. Location reporting itself improves far less — from 20.6% to 28.8% across the corpus 2010-2026. Read the last column with care: CCS and IMC 2026 have not been held and two more 2026 venue-years are incompletely selected, so it rests on fewer papers than the 198 count suggests it should.
 ==== Legal framing does predict the vantage point ====